Hexagram 13: Tong Ren - 同人

Fellowship with Men
Computing
ARPANET's Request for Comments Protocol

ARPANET's Request for Comments Protocol

Steve Crocker / ARPA researchers (1969)

Building the first internet nodes, researchers faced a problem: how to create fellowship among people at different institutions working on an unprecedented system? Steve Crocker invented the RFC—Request for Comments. Not mandate. Request. RFC 1: 'These notes are intended to be informal fast reactions... not official policy statements.' This humility created genuine fellowship. Fire (clarity) rising to Heaven (universal scope). One yielding nature (Crocker's modesty) uniting many firm persons (brilliant computer scientists). RFCs became internet governance foundation—fellowship in the open, through shared goals not authority. Anyone can read. Anyone can comment. The protocols we use daily exist because fellowship succeeded.

Practical Integration

You're trying to get people to work together on something that's never been done before. No established authority. No clear hierarchy. Just shared goals and the need to coordinate. Here's what this probably means: you need fellowship but you can't command it into existence. Steve Crocker faced this in 1969. Brilliant researchers at different institutions, all building pieces of ARPANET, needing to coordinate without any one person having authority over the others. His solution: RFC 1. Request for Comments. Not mandate. Not specification. Request. RFC 1 begins with an apology: 'These notes are intended to be informal fast reactions... they are not official policy statements.' This isn't weakness—it's the one yielding nature that unites many firm persons. When you're coordinating people of equal or superior technical capability, you can't command. You can only create conditions where fellowship emerges naturally. The classical text says fellowship must be 'in the open.' Not secret factions, not exclusive groups, not inner circles with privileged information. Everything public. Participation open. Process transparent. This isn't naive utopianism—it's engineering pragmatism. Difficult problems need all available intelligence, and intelligence won't participate if it's excluded or manipulated. Your version: open-source governance. Public design docs. Transparent decision-making. The Linux kernel mailing list. Python Enhancement Proposals. W3C standards development. These succeed because they're principle-based rather than personality-based, open rather than closed, humble rather than authoritative. The practical consequence: when you need to coordinate capable people on unprecedented work, your role isn't to control but to facilitate. Create the minimal structure that lets strong opinions coordinate productively. Make everything accessible. Invite critique. The alternative—closed-door decisions, inner circles, information asymmetry—creates factions rather than fellowship. Factions cannot cross the great water. They can't accomplish difficult work that requires genuine coordination of diverse capabilities. Crocker's RFCs are still how internet standards get made, fifty-plus years later. That's what fellowship in the open accomplishes.

References & Citations

  1. Request for Comments - Wikipedia
  2. Today's Internet Still Relies on an ARPANET-Era Protocol: The Request for Comments - IEEE Spectrum
  3. Request For Comments (RFC's) History - Steve Crocker
  4. The Publication of the First RFC - SciHi Blog

The Judgment

同人于野,亨。利涉大川。真正的兄弟情义基于宇宙大义而非私人利益,可以完成艰难的事业。

tóngfellowship with
rénothers
in
countryside
hēngfulfillment
worthwhile
shèto cross
great
chuānstream
worth
jūnnoble
young one
zhēnpersistence

The Image

天与火,同人。君子以类族辨物。兄弟情义需要在多样性中组织——不是混乱,而是有结构的承诺。

tiānheaven
accompanies
huǒfire
tóngfellowship with
rénothers
jūnnoble
young one
according to
lèikind
family
biànto distinguish
beings

The Lines (爻辭)

Line 1同人于門無咎

tóngfellowship with
rénothers
at
méngate
no
jiùblame

Line 2同人于宗吝

tóngfellowship with
rénothers
only in
zōngclan
lìnembarrassment

Line 3伏戎于莽升其高陵三歲不興

cache
róngweapons
in
mǎngunderbrush
shēngclimbing up
one's
gāohighest
línghills
sānthree
suìyears
of
xīngexuberance

Line 4乘其墉弗克攻吉

chéngmounting
one's
yōngbattlement
but not
capable of
gōngto attack
promising

Line 5同人先號咷而後笑大師克相遇

tóngfellowship with
rénothers
xiānbegins
háowailing
táoweeping
érand then
hòufollows with
xiàolaughter
great
shīarmies
can manage
xiāngeach other
to entertain

Line 6同人于郊無悔

tóngfellowship with
rénothers
in
jiāoouter districts
no
huǐto regret

Historical Context

Oracle Bone Script

天(☰)在上,火(☲)在下——火的本性是向天燃烧,创造出同人的意象。一条阴爻团结所有阳爻。

Period

周朝

Traditional Use

经典文本描述这是基于宇宙大义而非私人利益的和平联盟。内在清明,外在刚强——持久兄弟情义的特质。

Character Analysis

桃园结义体现了这一点:清明的共同目标(火)被宇宙原则(天)见证。公开的承诺、透明的过程、一个脆弱的立誓时刻团结了三个将重塑中国的战士。

Configuration

Lower Trigram

Upper Trigram

Binary

101111

Energy State

通过公开承诺建立的兄弟情义,热情上升迎接宇宙见证。从下往上读:下方阳-阴-阳(火),上方阳爻(天)。

Trigram Symbolism

☰ 天(上卦)- 宇宙见证、创造力量 ☲ 火(下卦)- 热情承诺、依附清明 火自然向天燃烧,创造结拜兄弟。

For the classical Wilhelm translation and line-by-line commentary, see Wilhelm Translation.