Hexagram 13: Tong Ren - 同人

Fellowship with Men
Computing
ARPANET's Request for Comments Protocol

ARPANET's Request for Comments Protocol

Steve Crocker / ARPA researchers (1969)

Building the first internet nodes, researchers faced a problem: how to create fellowship among people at different institutions working on an unprecedented system? Steve Crocker invented the RFC—Request for Comments. Not mandate. Request. RFC 1: 'These notes are intended to be informal fast reactions... not official policy statements.' This humility created genuine fellowship. Fire (clarity) rising to Heaven (universal scope). One yielding nature (Crocker's modesty) uniting many firm persons (brilliant computer scientists). RFCs became internet governance foundation—fellowship in the open, through shared goals not authority. Anyone can read. Anyone can comment. The protocols we use daily exist because fellowship succeeded.

Practical Integration

You're trying to get people to work together on something that's never been done before. No established authority. No clear hierarchy. Just shared goals and the need to coordinate. Here's what this probably means: you need fellowship but you can't command it into existence. Steve Crocker faced this in 1969. Brilliant researchers at different institutions, all building pieces of ARPANET, needing to coordinate without any one person having authority over the others. His solution: RFC 1. Request for Comments. Not mandate. Not specification. Request. RFC 1 begins with an apology: 'These notes are intended to be informal fast reactions... they are not official policy statements.' This isn't weakness—it's the one yielding nature that unites many firm persons. When you're coordinating people of equal or superior technical capability, you can't command. You can only create conditions where fellowship emerges naturally. The classical text says fellowship must be 'in the open.' Not secret factions, not exclusive groups, not inner circles with privileged information. Everything public. Participation open. Process transparent. This isn't naive utopianism—it's engineering pragmatism. Difficult problems need all available intelligence, and intelligence won't participate if it's excluded or manipulated. Your version: open-source governance. Public design docs. Transparent decision-making. The Linux kernel mailing list. Python Enhancement Proposals. W3C standards development. These succeed because they're principle-based rather than personality-based, open rather than closed, humble rather than authoritative. The practical consequence: when you need to coordinate capable people on unprecedented work, your role isn't to control but to facilitate. Create the minimal structure that lets strong opinions coordinate productively. Make everything accessible. Invite critique. The alternative—closed-door decisions, inner circles, information asymmetry—creates factions rather than fellowship. Factions cannot cross the great water. They can't accomplish difficult work that requires genuine coordination of diverse capabilities. Crocker's RFCs are still how internet standards get made, fifty-plus years later. That's what fellowship in the open accomplishes.

References & Citations

  1. Request for Comments - Wikipedia
  2. Today's Internet Still Relies on an ARPANET-Era Protocol: The Request for Comments - IEEE Spectrum
  3. Request For Comments (RFC's) History - Steve Crocker
  4. The Publication of the First RFC - SciHi Blog

The Judgment

同人於野,亨。利涉大川。真正嘅兄弟情義基於宇宙大義而唔係私人利益,可以完成艱難嘅事業。

tóngfellowship with
rénothers
in
countryside
hēngfulfillment
worthwhile
shèto cross
great
chuānstream
worth
jūnnoble
young one
zhēnpersistence

The Image

天同火,同人。君子以類族辨物。兄弟情義需要喺多樣性入面組織——唔係混亂,而係有結構嘅承諾。

tiānheaven
accompanies
huǒfire
tóngfellowship with
rénothers
jūnnoble
young one
according to
lèikind
family
biànto distinguish
beings

The Lines (爻辭)

Line 1同人于門無咎

tóngfellowship with
rénothers
at
méngate
no
jiùblame

Line 2同人于宗吝

tóngfellowship with
rénothers
only in
zōngclan
lìnembarrassment

Line 3伏戎于莽升其高陵三歲不興

cache
róngweapons
in
mǎngunderbrush
shēngclimbing up
one's
gāohighest
línghills
sānthree
suìyears
of
xīngexuberance

Line 4乘其墉弗克攻吉

chéngmounting
one's
yōngbattlement
but not
capable of
gōngto attack
promising

Line 5同人先號咷而後笑大師克相遇

tóngfellowship with
rénothers
xiānbegins
háowailing
táoweeping
érand then
hòufollows with
xiàolaughter
great
shīarmies
can manage
xiāngeach other
to entertain

Line 6同人于郊無悔

tóngfellowship with
rénothers
in
jiāoouter districts
no
huǐto regret

Historical Context

Oracle Bone Script

天(☰)喺上,火(☲)喺下——火嘅本性係向天燃燒,造成同人嘅意象。一條陰爻團結晒所有陽爻。

Period

周朝

Traditional Use

經典文本講呢個係基於宇宙大義而唔係私人利益嘅和平聯盟。內在清明,外在剛強——持久兄弟情義嘅特質。

Character Analysis

桃園結義體現咗呢個:清明嘅共同目標(火)由宇宙原則(天)見證。公開嘅承諾、透明嘅過程、一個脆弱嘅誓言時刻團結咗三個改變中國嘅戰士。

Configuration

Lower Trigram

Upper Trigram

Binary

101111

Energy State

透過公開承諾建立嘅兄弟情義,熱情上升到宇宙見證。由下至上讀:下面陽-陰-陽(火),上面陽爻(天)。

Trigram Symbolism

☰ 天(上卦)- 宇宙見證、創造力量 ☲ 火(下卦)- 熱情承諾、清明依附 火自然向天燃燒,造成結拜兄弟。

For the classical Wilhelm translation and line-by-line commentary, see Wilhelm Translation.